The kubelet
needs to preserve node stability when available compute resources are low.
This is especially important when dealing with incompressible resources such as memory or disk.
If either resource is exhausted, the node would become unstable.
The kubelet
can pro-actively monitor for and prevent against total starvation of a compute resource. In
cases where it could appear to occur, the kubelet
can pro-actively fail one or more pods in order to reclaim
the starved resource. When the kubelet
fails a pod, it terminates all containers in the pod, and the PodPhase
is transitioned to Failed
.
The kubelet
can support the ability to trigger eviction decisions on the signals described in the
table below. The value of each signal is described in the description column based on the kubelet
summary API.
Eviction Signal | Description |
---|---|
memory.available |
memory.available := node.status.capacity[memory] - node.stats.memory.workingSet |
In future releases, the kubelet
will support the ability to trigger eviction decisions based on disk pressure.
Until that time, it is recommended users take advantage of garbage collection.
The kubelet
supports the ability to specify eviction thresholds that trigger the kubelet
to reclaim resources.
Each threshold is of the following form:
<eviction-signal><operator><quantity>
eviction-signal
tokens as defined above.operator
tokens are <
quantity
tokens must match the quantity representation used by KubernetesA soft eviction threshold pairs an eviction threshold with a required
administrator specified grace period. No action is taken by the kubelet
to reclaim resources associated with the eviction signal until that grace
period has been exceeded. If no grace period is provided, the kubelet
will
error on startup.
In addition, if a soft eviction threshold has been met, an operator can
specify a maximum allowed pod termination grace period to use when evicting
pods from the node. If specified, the kubelet
will use the lesser value among
the pod.Spec.TerminationGracePeriodSeconds
and the max allowed grace period.
If not specified, the kubelet
will kill pods immediately with no graceful
termination.
To configure soft eviction thresholds, the following flags are supported:
eviction-soft
describes a set of eviction thresholds (e.g. memory.available<1.5Gi
) that if met over a
corresponding grace period would trigger a pod eviction.eviction-soft-grace-period
describes a set of eviction grace periods (e.g. memory.available=1m30s
) that
correspond to how long a soft eviction threshold must hold before triggering a pod eviction.eviction-max-pod-grace-period
describes the maximum allowed grace period (in seconds) to use when terminating
pods in response to a soft eviction threshold being met.A hard eviction threshold has no grace period, and if observed, the kubelet
will take immediate action to reclaim the associated starved resource. If a
hard eviction threshold is met, the kubelet
will kill the pod immediately
with no graceful termination.
To configure hard eviction thresholds, the following flag is supported:
eviction-hard
describes a set of eviction thresholds (e.g. memory.available<1Gi
) that if met
would trigger a pod eviction.The kubelet
evaluates eviction thresholds per its configured housekeeping interval.
housekeeping-interval
is the interval between container housekeepings.The kubelet
will map one or more eviction signals to a corresponding node condition.
If a hard eviction threshold has been met, or a soft eviction threshold has been met
independent of its associated grace period, the kubelet
will report a condition that
reflects the node is under pressure.
The following node conditions are defined that correspond to the specified eviction signal.
Node Condition | Eviction Signal | Description |
---|---|---|
MemoryPressure |
memory.available |
Available memory on the node has satisfied an eviction threshold |
The kubelet
will continue to report node status updates at the frequency specified by
--node-status-update-frequency
which defaults to 10s
.
If a node is oscillating above and below a soft eviction threshold, but not exceeding its associated grace period, it would cause the corresponding node condition to constantly oscillate between true and false, and could cause poor scheduling decisions as a consequence.
To protect against this oscillation, the following flag is defined to control how
long the kubelet
must wait before transitioning out of a pressure condition.
eviction-pressure-transition-period
is the duration for which the kubelet
has
to wait before transitioning out of an eviction pressure condition.The kubelet
would ensure that it has not observed an eviction threshold being met
for the specified pressure condition for the period specified before toggling the
condition back to false
.
If an eviction threshold has been met and the grace period has passed,
the kubelet
will initiate the process of evicting pods until it has observed
the signal has gone below its defined threshold.
The kubelet
ranks pods for eviction 1) by their quality of service,
2) and among those with the same quality of service by the consumption of the
starved compute resource relative to the pods scheduling request.
BestEffort
pods that consume the most of the starved resource are failed
first.Burstable
pods that consume the greatest amount of the starved resource
relative to their request for that resource are killed first. If no pod
has exceeded its request, the strategy targets the largest consumer of the
starved resource.Guaranteed
pods that consume the greatest amount of the starved resource
relative to their request are killed first. If no pod has exceeded its request,
the strategy targets the largest consumer of the starved resource.A Guaranteed
pod is guaranteed to never be evicted because of another pod’s
resource consumption. If a system daemon (i.e. kubelet
, docker
, journald
, etc.)
is consuming more resources than were reserved via system-reserved
or kube-reserved
allocations,
and the node only has Guaranteed
pod(s) remaining, then the node must choose to evict a
Guaranteed
pod in order to preserve node stability, and to limit the impact
of the unexpected consumption to other Guaranteed
pod(s).
The node will report a condition when a compute resource is under pressure. The scheduler views that condition as a signal to dissuade placing additional pods on the node.
Node Condition | Scheduler Behavior |
---|---|
MemoryPressure |
BestEffort pods are not scheduled to the node. |
If the node experiences a system OOM (out of memory) event prior to the kubelet
is able to reclaim memory,
the node depends on the oom_killer to respond.
The kubelet
sets a oom_score_adj
value for each container based on the quality of service for the pod.
Quality of Service | oom_score_adj |
---|---|
Guaranteed |
-998 |
BestEffort |
1000 |
Burstable |
min(max(2, 1000 - (1000 * memoryRequestBytes) / machineMemoryCapacityBytes), 999) |
If the kubelet
is unable to reclaim memory prior to a node experiencing system OOM, the oom_killer
will calculate
an oom_score
based on the percentage of memory its using on the node, and then add the oom_score_adj
to get an
effective oom_score
for the container, and then kills the container with the highest score.
The intended behavior should be that containers with the lowest quality of service that are consuming the largest amount of memory relative to the scheduling request should be killed first in order to reclaim memory.
Unlike pod eviction, if a pod container is OOM killed, it may be restarted by the kubelet
based on its RestartPolicy
.
Let’s imagine the following scenario:
10Gi
kubelet
, etc.)To facilitate this scenario, the kubelet
would be launched as follows:
--eviction-hard=memory.available<500Mi
--system-reserved=memory=1.5Gi
Implicit in this configuration is the understanding that “System reserved” should include the amount of memory covered by the eviction threshold.
To reach that capacity, either some pod is using more than its request, or the system is using more than 500Mi
.
This configuration will ensure that the scheduler does not place pods on a node that immediately induce memory pressure and trigger eviction assuming those pods use less than their configured request.
It is never desired for a kubelet
to evict a pod that was derived from
a DaemonSet
since the pod will immediately be recreated and rescheduled
back to the same node.
At the moment, the kubelet
has no ability to distinguish a pod created
from DaemonSet
versus any other object. If/when that information is
available, the kubelet
could pro-actively filter those pods from the
candidate set of pods provided to the eviction strategy.
In general, it is strongly recommended that DaemonSet
not
create BestEffort
pods to avoid being identified as a candidate pod
for eviction. Instead DaemonSet
should ideally launch Guaranteed
pods.